For the following reasons, the trial court's order is reversed. The broad question raised for this Court's review is whether the trial court erred in ruling that the townships improperly rejected a disappointed bidder's public contract bid for failure to comply with bidding requirements *479 set forth by the townships. Lower Paxton Township, West Hanover Township, members of the townships' Boards of Supervisors, and Waste Management of Central Pennsylvania, a division of Waste Management of Pennsylvania, Inc., (Waste Management) (collectively Appellants) appeal from the Augfinal order of the Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas denying Appellants' post-trial motions and confirming the trial court's Jdecree nisi permanently enjoining the townships from executing a five-year waste hauling contract entered into with Waste Management. *478 Frank Michael D'Amore, for appellants.īefore DOYLE and SMITH, JJ., and KELTON, Senior Judge. Shatto, Jr., and Waste Management of PA, Camp Hill, Appellants. Koch, Dutch Lentz, Donald Alfano, West Hanover Township, Donald L.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |